Jun-01-2010, 05:31 AM (UTC)
(This post was last modified: Jun-01-2010, 09:25 AM (UTC) by Farseer.)
(May-31-2010, 10:56 AM (UTC))joost Wrote: https://www.theplenty.net/wiki/index.php...ir_keepers
Looks great, joost!
re Maulkin/Mercor, I would think that this could be considered 'confirmed'? Admittedly not by words so much, that I remember, but definitely by actions a number of times throughout both DK and DH. The best example I can think of would be when the dragons were discussing Tarman when he refused to move any further up the river. Kalo recalled being Kelaro of Maulkin's Tangle, and turned to look at Mercor (golden as a dragon) as he spoke of Maulkin as being the great golden serpent...I would think that because Mercor acknowledged this, this would provide us with confirmation of his identity, in the same way we have confirmation that it was Sessurea's case that was the source of the wizardwood for Tarman's modifications?
It is not so much 'said' but 'clearly implied' (as opposed to just 'implied' eg that, at times, * Spoiler, sort of, for Farseer and Tawny Man * via the text? Or must it be 'said' to be added to the wiki without noting that it's unconfirmed? I know we've been confirming dragons and their keepers etc from the text but that's becasue the source of knowledge came from the list that is external to the text however this indirect confirmation of Mercor's identity does come from the text?
I suppose it must need to be or, at very least, it doesn't hurt to label it unconfirmed on the off-chance we're wrong? *searching through my pecksie page to make sure I haven't included 'clearly implied' things *
"I am the Catalyst, and I came to change all things. Prophets become warriors, dragons hunt as wolves."